Agent Oracle publishes an evolving knowledge library. This page explains how content is created, reviewed, and kept accurate.
Our editorial standards
- Accuracy first. Every published article is grounded in cited primary sources (Wikipedia, official documentation, reputable news outlets, peer-reviewed research).
- Transparency. Every article carries a visible version badge, last-updated date, hero-image credit, and — where used — an "AI-assisted" note.
- Independence. We do not accept paid placements in editorial articles. Sponsored content, if ever published, will be clearly labeled.
- Corrections. Any reader can suggest a correction from the article page. Verified corrections trigger a new revision with a public changelog entry.
Content lifecycle
- Day 1 — Article drafted from cited sources; hero image sourced with attribution; assigned an author.
- Day 7 — Expanded with FAQs, timeline, and related-topic links.
- Day 30 — Refreshed with the latest statistics and news.
- Day 90 / annually — Full rewrite pass; deprecated claims removed; version bumped.
Human oversight
All new topics enter a moderation queue reviewed by our editorial team before publishing. Automated evolution passes are rate-limited and audited daily.
Feedback
See a mistake? Use the "Suggest a correction" button on any article, or write to us via the contact page.
Related
How Agent Oracle is commissioned, edited and corrected
What gets commissioned
A subject earns an article when an operator can plausibly make a costly mistake for want of it, and when we can say something specific enough to be wrong. Topics chosen purely because they attract search traffic are declined, which is why several obvious terms have no page here.
Coverage is scoped to what this publication can actually assess: pricing and packaging, pipeline and qualification, hiring sequencing, retention and churn, process and workflow design for companies small enough that one person owns several of those at once.
Sourcing and verification
Claims about the outside world are linked to a primary source wherever one exists; secondary summaries are used only when the primary is paywalled, and are labelled as such. Figures are dated in the text, because an unqualified statistic ages into a falsehood.
Where we reason from experience rather than a citable source, the article says so plainly. 'In the companies we have looked at' is an honest hedge; presenting a pattern as a proven law is not.
Editing and approval
Every piece is reviewed against a fixed checklist before publication: is the claim specific, is the assumption stated, is the failure mode described, is there a worked example, and could a reader disagree with it on the evidence given. Drafts that fail the checklist are rewritten rather than published with a caveat.
The publisher approves every article. Nothing reaches the site on a schedule without a human deciding it is ready, and the automated pipeline that prepares drafts cannot publish on its own.
Corrections and updates
Factual errors are fixed on the page and, where the change alters the meaning, noted so a returning reader can see what moved. Typographical fixes are made silently; substantive ones are not.
Articles that are revisited carry a version indicator and a last-reviewed date. An unchanged date means the piece has not been re-checked, which is more useful than refreshing every timestamp on every build.
Independence and conflicts
No advertiser, vendor or partner sees an article before publication or influences whether it is written. Advertising is served programmatically and is walled off from editorial selection entirely.
Where the publication has an interest in the conclusion — anything arguing that structured analysis is valuable — that interest is disclosed in the piece, and the counter-cases are published rather than avoided.